111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-45.10%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-45.10%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
142.22%
EBIT growth below 50% of JHX's 386.17%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
142.22%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x JHX's 123.19%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
-58.43%
Negative net income growth while JHX stands at 43.58%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.65%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of JHX's 117.83%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
20.93%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of JHX's 48.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
36.76%
Positive 3Y CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.50%
Below 50% of JHX's 586.41%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
57.14%
Positive short-term CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.