PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
51.63%
Positive revenue growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
51.63%
Positive gross profit growth while JHX is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
51.63%
EBIT growth below 50% of JHX's 386.17%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
51.63%
Operating income growth under 50% of JHX's 123.19%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
114.00%
Net income growth above 1.5x JHX's 43.58%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
100.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x JHX's 50.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x JHX's 51.06%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
7.00%
Slight or no buybacks while JHX is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
7.00%
Diluted share count expanding well above JHX's 0.12%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
127.65%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to JHX's 117.83%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
71.37%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x JHX's 48.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
93.81%
Positive 3Y CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
175.00%
Below 50% of JHX's 586.41%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
214.29%
Positive short-term CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.