PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.35%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
594.85%
Positive gross profit growth while JHX is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1007.19%
EBIT growth above 1.5x JHX's 386.17%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1007.19%
Operating income growth above 1.5x JHX's 123.19%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
214.64%
Net income growth above 1.5x JHX's 43.58%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
85.71%
EPS growth above 1.5x JHX's 50.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
76.19%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x JHX's 51.06%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
2.37%
Slight or no buybacks while JHX is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
2.37%
Diluted share count expanding well above JHX's 0.12%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.39%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of JHX's 117.83%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
44.51%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to JHX's 48.10%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
-11.10%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
396.48%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of JHX's 586.41%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
193.37%
Positive short-term CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.