PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.85%
Revenue growth under 50% of JHX's 13.59%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-22.92%
Negative gross profit growth while JHX is at 19.79%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
144.78%
EBIT growth above 1.5x JHX's 34.52%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
144.78%
Operating income growth above 1.5x JHX's 34.52%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-39.05%
Negative net income growth while JHX stands at 20.73%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-99.75%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-99.75%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
312.61%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 59.67%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
128.85%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 59.67%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
82.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to JHX's 77.65%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
314.20%
Below 50% of JHX's 5706.99%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
280.00%
Below 50% of JHX's 5706.99%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
258.19%
Positive short-term CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
SG&A growth well above JHX's 181.67%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.