111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.34%
Positive revenue growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-70.43%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-91.94%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-91.94%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
1.19%
Positive net income growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1.61%
Positive EPS growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1.64%
Positive diluted EPS growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.11%
Share reduction while JHX is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.14%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
336.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 76.26%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
172.59%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 76.26%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
91.43%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x JHX's 61.61%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
527.76%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 90.71% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
372.68%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 90.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
170.55%
Positive short-term CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
118.86%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
59.95%
Positive short-term equity growth while JHX is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
