PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.83%
Positive revenue growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
334.67%
Positive gross profit growth while JHX is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1494.64%
Positive EBIT growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1494.64%
Positive operating income growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
93.84%
Positive net income growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
92.06%
Positive EPS growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
93.55%
Positive diluted EPS growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.20%
Share count expansion well above JHX's 0.28%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.24%
Slight or no buyback while JHX is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
370.57%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 65.65%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
149.32%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 65.65%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
88.51%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 47.42%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
367.08%
Positive 10Y CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
146.23%
Positive 5Y CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
83.31%
Positive short-term CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.