111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.49%
Negative revenue growth while JHX stands at 17.59%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
682.43%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x JHX's 24.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
140.62%
EBIT growth similar to JHX's 134.75%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
140.62%
Operating income growth similar to JHX's 134.75%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
-48.59%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-99.71%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-99.71%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
354.43%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 85.80%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
215.80%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 106.73%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
106.86%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 36.04%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
255.61%
Below 50% of JHX's 3964.83%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
487.10%
Positive 5Y CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
105.84%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 5.69%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
SG&A growth well above JHX's 173.90%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.