111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.22%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-71.13%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-92.68%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-92.68%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-0.27%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.96%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.17%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
336.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 65.78%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
218.02%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 83.61%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
97.74%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 27.29%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
241.78%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 71.23% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
490.92%
Positive 5Y CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
99.03%
Positive short-term CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
143.10%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
79.17%
Positive short-term equity growth while JHX is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
