111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
47.77%
Revenue growth above 1.5x JHX's 4.66%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
103.38%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x JHX's 8.09%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
6432.14%
Positive EBIT growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
6432.14%
Positive operating income growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1018.10%
Positive net income growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1081.25%
Positive EPS growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1075.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.33%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.66%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-36.31%
Dividend reduction while JHX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
309.39%
Positive OCF growth while JHX is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
171.54%
Positive FCF growth while JHX is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
24.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of JHX's 156.30%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while JHX stands at 36.73%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
733.85%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 114.02%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.99%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
3001.72%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 194.02% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
112.60%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x JHX's 76.28%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
140.48%
Below 50% of JHX's 3905.74%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.38%
Below 50% of JHX's 52.80%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
114.32%
Stable or rising dividend while JHX is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.28%
Negative near-term dividend growth while JHX invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
22.82%
Our AR growth while JHX is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-2.27%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.82%
Positive asset growth while JHX is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.77%
75-90% of JHX's 4.51%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
3.16%
We have some new debt while JHX reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.01%
SG&A declining or stable vs. JHX's 18.54%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.
