PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
51.07%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MLM's 33.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
119.16%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MLM's 62.39%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
10650.00%
Positive operating income growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1503.19%
Net income growth above 1.5x MLM's 182.76%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
1400.00%
Positive EPS growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1393.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.28%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
0.15%
Slight or no buyback while MLM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
318.04%
OCF growth above 1.5x MLM's 77.52%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
151.80%
FCF growth under 50% of MLM's 1486.67%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
30.07%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MLM's 118.52%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
92.82%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 46.53%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-22.83%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MLM stands at 13.59%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
1279.14%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 367.67%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
241.68%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 49.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
408.16%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 242.64%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
3324.04%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 340.34% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
655.30%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 55.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-28.57%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
113.09%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of MLM's 141.57%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
41.01%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MLM's 75.35%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
21.85%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MLM's 42.45%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
153.74%
10Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MLM's 105.80%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if a higher payout growth rate remains sustainable long term.
20.57%
Below 50% of MLM's 42.62%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
-18.96%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MLM invests at 29.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
26.24%
AR growth well above MLM's 23.33%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
1.83%
We show growth while MLM is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
3.97%
Asset growth above 1.5x MLM's 1.95%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.99%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MLM's 3.61%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.96%
We have some new debt while MLM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.66%
We expand SG&A while MLM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.