PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.41%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MLM's 12.50%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
7.41%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of MLM's 12.35%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
7.41%
EBIT growth below 50% of MLM's 22.48%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
7.41%
Operating income growth under 50% of MLM's 22.48%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
7.40%
Net income growth under 50% of MLM's 26.10%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
4.55%
EPS growth under 50% of MLM's 26.92%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
4.55%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MLM's 25.64%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
2.73%
Slight or no buybacks while MLM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
2.73%
Diluted share count expanding well above MLM's 0.36%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
177.01%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 114.54%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
135.83%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MLM's 114.54%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
78.84%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MLM's 61.78%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
228.57%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 106.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
64.29%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of MLM's 94.12%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.