111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-61.50%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-61.50%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
142.18%
Positive EBIT growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
142.18%
Positive operating income growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-64.92%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
177.32%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MLM's 150.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
143.32%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to MLM's 150.24%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
72.63%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of MLM's 80.88%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.00%
Below 50% of MLM's 7757.03%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
90.91%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to MLM's 89.17%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.