PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.99%
Negative revenue growth while MLM stands at 36.47%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-89.69%
Negative gross profit growth while MLM is at 127.46%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-93.53%
Negative EBIT growth while MLM is at 303.11%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-93.53%
Negative operating income growth while MLM is at 303.11%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-4.08%
Negative net income growth while MLM stands at 420.15%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.08%
Share reduction while MLM is at 0.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-4.08%
Reduced diluted shares while MLM is at 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
177.57%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MLM's 138.49%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
143.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to MLM's 138.49%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
72.79%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MLM's 62.45%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 121.28%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
90.91%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 52.61%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.