PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.98%
Negative revenue growth while MLM stands at 34.04%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-70.36%
Negative gross profit growth while MLM is at 218.26%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-93.49%
Negative EBIT growth while MLM is at 13691.84%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-93.49%
Negative operating income growth while MLM is at 13691.84%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-0.98%
Negative net income growth while MLM stands at 783.19%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.04%
Slight or no buybacks while MLM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.02%
Reduced diluted shares while MLM is at 0.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
304.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MLM's 230.26%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
66.22%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 38.48%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
39.44%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MLM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
231.47%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 131.88% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
10.49%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 4.79%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
69.39%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 13.10%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.77%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 54.34%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
26.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MLM's 17.88%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.