PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-27.63%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
23.14%
Positive gross profit growth while MLM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
144.19%
Positive EBIT growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
144.19%
Positive operating income growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-55.08%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
131.86%
Positive EPS growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
132.14%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
258.50%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MLM's 192.11%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
71.52%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 40.95%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
95.20%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 21.88%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
159.14%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MLM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
126.75%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MLM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
211.15%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MLM's 169.21%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We expand SG&A while MLM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.