111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.75%
Negative revenue growth while MLM stands at 39.38%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-71.54%
Negative gross profit growth while MLM is at 160.26%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-93.45%
Negative EBIT growth while MLM is at 420.95%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-93.45%
Negative operating income growth while MLM is at 420.95%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-7.86%
Negative net income growth while MLM stands at 768.62%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
5.56%
EPS growth under 50% of MLM's 780.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
5.56%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MLM's 766.67%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-11.52%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-11.51%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
277.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MLM's 210.23%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
84.68%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 51.32%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
80.61%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 20.20%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
169.86%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of MLM's 206.98%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
141.24%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 46.51%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
184.47%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 20.47%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 40.59%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
59.46%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 12.30%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.