PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.85%
Positive revenue growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-22.92%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
144.78%
Positive EBIT growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
144.78%
Positive operating income growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-39.05%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-99.75%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-99.75%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
312.61%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MLM's 270.27%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
128.85%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 65.53%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
82.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MLM's 59.55%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
314.20%
Below 50% of MLM's 653.03%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
280.00%
Below 50% of MLM's 785.78%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
258.19%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to MLM's 258.60%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
SG&A growth well above MLM's 7.79%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.