PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.90%
Revenue growth under 50% of PUK's 27.93%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-67.09%
Negative gross profit growth while PUK is at 27.93%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-93.13%
Negative EBIT growth while PUK is at 246.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-93.13%
Negative operating income growth while PUK is at 27.93%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
13.90%
Net income growth under 50% of PUK's 2157.71%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
8.33%
EPS growth under 50% of PUK's 1749.71%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
8.33%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PUK's 1749.71%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.01%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.05%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
187.25%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PUK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
60.19%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PUK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
16.73%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PUK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
165.62%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of PUK's 202.69%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
32.81%
Below 50% of PUK's 835.13%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-36.76%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PUK is 48.42%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.54%
Positive short-term equity growth while PUK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.