PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.34%
Revenue growth under 50% of PUK's 27.93%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-70.43%
Negative gross profit growth while PUK is at 27.93%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-91.94%
Negative EBIT growth while PUK is at 246.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-91.94%
Negative operating income growth while PUK is at 27.93%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
1.19%
Net income growth under 50% of PUK's 2157.71%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
1.61%
EPS growth under 50% of PUK's 1749.71%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
1.64%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PUK's 1749.71%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.11%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.14%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
336.67%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PUK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
172.59%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PUK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
91.43%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PUK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
527.76%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PUK's 202.69% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
372.68%
Below 50% of PUK's 835.13%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
170.55%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PUK's 48.42%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
118.86%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PUK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
59.95%
Positive short-term equity growth while PUK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.