PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.49%
Negative revenue growth while PUK stands at 27.93%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
682.43%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x PUK's 27.93%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
140.62%
EBIT growth 50-75% of PUK's 246.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
140.62%
Operating income growth above 1.5x PUK's 27.93%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-48.59%
Negative net income growth while PUK stands at 2157.71%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-99.71%
Negative EPS growth while PUK is at 1749.71%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-99.71%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PUK is at 1749.71%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
354.43%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PUK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
215.80%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PUK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
106.86%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PUK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
255.61%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PUK's 202.69%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
487.10%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of PUK's 835.13%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
105.84%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PUK's 48.42%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
SG&A growth of 100.00% while PUK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.