PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
51.07%
Revenue growth above 1.5x VMC's 28.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
119.16%
Positive gross profit growth while VMC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
10650.00%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VMC's 108.04%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
1503.19%
Net income growth above 1.5x VMC's 148.95%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
1400.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x VMC's 148.98%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
1393.33%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x VMC's 147.96%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.28%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
0.15%
Slight or no buyback while VMC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
318.04%
OCF growth above 1.5x VMC's 35.86%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
151.80%
FCF growth 75-90% of VMC's 185.99%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
30.07%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VMC's 136.29%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
92.82%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 59.27%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-22.83%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VMC stands at 8.15%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
1279.14%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 655.83%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
241.68%
Positive OCF/share growth while VMC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
408.16%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 129.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
3324.04%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 570.34% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
655.30%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 53.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-28.57%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VMC is 72.24%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
113.09%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VMC's 100.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
41.01%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of VMC's 46.13%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
21.85%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of VMC's 25.74%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
153.74%
Below 50% of VMC's 389.57%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
20.57%
Below 50% of VMC's 43.96%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
-18.96%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VMC invests at 22.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
26.24%
AR growth well above VMC's 16.15%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
1.83%
Inventory growth well above VMC's 0.62%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.97%
Asset growth above 1.5x VMC's 1.57%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.99%
BV/share growth above 1.5x VMC's 3.40%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.96%
We have some new debt while VMC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.66%
SG&A growth well above VMC's 4.41%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.