PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.35%
Negative revenue growth while VMC stands at 7.34%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
594.85%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VMC's 10.12%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
1007.19%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VMC's 23.12%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1007.19%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VMC's 23.12%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
214.64%
Net income growth above 1.5x VMC's 36.84%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
85.71%
EPS growth above 1.5x VMC's 37.10%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
76.19%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x VMC's 37.70%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
2.37%
Slight or no buybacks while VMC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
2.37%
Slight or no buyback while VMC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.39%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of VMC's 154.52%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
44.51%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VMC's 99.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-11.10%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VMC stands at 51.72%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
396.48%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 150.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
193.37%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 41.67%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.