111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-90.38%
Negative revenue growth while VMC stands at 2.41%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
28.82%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VMC's 4.19%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
38.02%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VMC's 8.22%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
38.02%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VMC's 8.22%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
166.26%
Net income growth above 1.5x VMC's 13.00%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
156.25%
EPS growth above 1.5x VMC's 13.33%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
146.67%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x VMC's 12.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
1.70%
Share count expansion well above VMC's 0.27%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
12.70%
Diluted share count expanding well above VMC's 0.08%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.09%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VMC stands at 156.74%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-80.65%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VMC stands at 71.40%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-87.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VMC stands at 43.39%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
192.86%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 54.42%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
57.69%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 17.96%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.