111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-24.21%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-24.21%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
143.23%
Positive EBIT growth while VMC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
143.23%
Positive operating income growth while VMC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-72.54%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
308.96%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 189.72%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
68.07%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 27.24%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
60.93%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 7.57%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
234.86%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of VMC's 393.48%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
11.62%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VMC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
95.50%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of VMC's 159.93%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.