PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.98%
Negative revenue growth while VMC stands at 32.21%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-70.36%
Negative gross profit growth while VMC is at 110.41%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-93.49%
Negative EBIT growth while VMC is at 267.50%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-93.49%
Negative operating income growth while VMC is at 267.50%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-0.98%
Negative net income growth while VMC stands at 485.50%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.04%
Share reduction more than 1.5x VMC's 0.20%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.02%
Reduced diluted shares while VMC is at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
304.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 165.29%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
66.22%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 31.85%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
39.44%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VMC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
231.47%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VMC's 176.60%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
10.49%
Below 50% of VMC's 38.30%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
69.39%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 9.20%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.77%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 50.75%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
26.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VMC's 23.03%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.