111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.86%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VMC stands at 57.92%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-21.14%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VMC stands at 28.39%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.37%
Below 50% of VMC's 154.43%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-15.90%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VMC stands at 18.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
454.81%
Below 50% of VMC's 1248.24%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
41.58%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to VMC's 41.14%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.94%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 30.44%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
22.63%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VMC's 18.16%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.56%
Below 50% of VMC's 2701.55%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
8.38%
Below 50% of VMC's 180.03%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.