PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.12%
Negative revenue growth while VMC stands at 3.45%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.85%
Negative gross profit growth while VMC is at 1.32%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-18.15%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-18.15%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-18.18%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-13.29%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-11.46%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-3.18%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-3.78%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-36.67%
Dividend reduction while VMC stands at 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
20.40%
OCF growth under 50% of VMC's 91.37%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
20.85%
FCF growth under 50% of VMC's 88.50%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.08%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-2.35%
Negative asset growth while VMC invests at 2.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.05%
We have a declining book value while VMC shows 3.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
9.58%
We have some new debt while VMC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.94%
We cut SG&A while VMC invests at 3.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.