111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-30.55%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-46.45%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-97.89%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-97.89%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-88.18%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-88.32%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-88.32%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-3.85%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-3.06%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-135.43%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-181.94%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
9.79%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VMC's 165.86%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
9.79%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VMC's 54.69%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
9.79%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VMC's 45.01%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-14.61%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while VMC stands at 3545.65%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-14.61%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VMC is at 48.87%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-14.61%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VMC stands at 2.68%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
547.47%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 87.92% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
547.47%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VMC's 61.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
547.47%
Positive short-term CAGR while VMC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
4.46%
Below 50% of VMC's 83.62%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
4.46%
Below 50% of VMC's 43.21%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
4.46%
Below 50% of VMC's 22.37%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.46%
Our AR growth while VMC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
7.64%
Inventory growth well above VMC's 5.13%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-2.39%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.23%
We have a declining book value while VMC shows 0.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
7.87%
We have some new debt while VMC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.59%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.