PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
26.83%
Positive growth while CPAC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
334.67%
Positive growth while CPAC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
242.72%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x CPAC's 1.05%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while CPAC shows 114.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-100.00%
Operating expenses reduction while CPAC shows 1.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
100.00%
D&A growth while CPAC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
1541.81%
EBITDA growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1194.48%
EBITDA margin growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1494.64%
Operating income growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1157.28%
Operating margin growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while CPAC shows 2.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-695.50%
Tax expense reduction while CPAC shows 2.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
93.84%
Net income growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.83%
Net margin growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
92.06%
EPS growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
93.55%
Diluted EPS growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.20%
Share count increase while CPAC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.24%
Diluted share increase while CPAC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.