PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
47.77%
Positive growth while CPAC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
26.51%
Cost increase while CPAC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
103.38%
Positive growth while CPAC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
37.63%
Margin expansion while CPAC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.01%
G&A growth less than half of CPAC's 21.71%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-163.35%
Other expenses reduction while CPAC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.30%
Similar operating expenses growth to CPAC's 4.14%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
20.14%
Total costs growth while CPAC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.54%
Interest expense growth while CPAC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.80%
D&A growth above 1.5x CPAC's 2.94%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
272.30%
EBITDA growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
151.94%
EBITDA margin growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6432.14%
Operating income growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4320.39%
Operating margin growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-235.21%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1650.51%
Pre-tax income growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1084.59%
Pre-tax margin growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2363.16%
Tax expense growth while CPAC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
1018.10%
Net income growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
656.64%
Net margin growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1081.25%
EPS growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1075.00%
Diluted EPS growth while CPAC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.33%
Share count reduction while CPAC shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.66%
Diluted share reduction while CPAC shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.