PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.64%
Revenue decline while CPAC shows 1.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-11.56%
Cost reduction while CPAC shows 2.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-22.15%
Gross profit decline while CPAC shows 0.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.49%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
214.61%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of CPAC's 339.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-1.86%
Operating expenses reduction while CPAC shows 23.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.18%
Total costs reduction while CPAC shows 6.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.44%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
15.65%
D&A growth while CPAC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-30.53%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.24%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-43.79%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.57%
Other expenses reduction while CPAC shows 5.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-47.92%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-73.07%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-45.82%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.24%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.22%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.47%
Share count reduction while CPAC shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.26%
Diluted share reduction while CPAC shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.