PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-23.83%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-13.85%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-41.87%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.17%
G&A reduction while CPAC shows 19.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-113.73%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.53%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-13.24%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
13.13%
Interest expense change of 13.13% while CPAC maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-11.83%
D&A reduction while CPAC shows 26.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-70.87%
EBITDA decline while CPAC shows 4.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-59.43%
EBITDA margin decline while CPAC shows 10.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-98.37%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-97.86%
Operating margin decline while CPAC shows 1.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.17%
Other expenses reduction while CPAC shows 1.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-114.79%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-119.42%
Pre-tax margin decline while CPAC shows 0.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-140.56%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-112.82%
Net income decline while CPAC shows 5.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-116.84%
Net margin decline while CPAC shows 10.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.56%
EPS decline while CPAC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.71%
Diluted EPS decline while CPAC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.25%
Share count reduction while CPAC shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.02%
Diluted share reduction while CPAC shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.