PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-63.74%
Revenue decline while EXP shows 27.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-58.81%
Cost reduction while EXP shows 27.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-73.24%
Gross profit decline while EXP shows 29.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-26.21%
Margin decline while EXP shows 1.60% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.75%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-57.64%
Total costs reduction while EXP shows 24.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-56.62%
Interest expense reduction while EXP shows 18.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-57.14%
D&A reduction while EXP shows 5.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-71.78%
EBITDA decline while EXP shows 30.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-66.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-99.92%
Operating income decline while EXP shows 66.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-99.78%
Operating margin decline while EXP shows 30.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while EXP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-101.72%
Pre-tax income decline while EXP shows 26.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-104.73%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-102.69%
Tax expense reduction while EXP shows 53.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-101.60%
Net income decline while EXP shows 20.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-104.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-102.14%
EPS decline while EXP shows 22.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-102.16%
Diluted EPS decline while EXP shows 21.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.98%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.87%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.