PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.92%
Positive growth while EXP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.98%
Cost increase while EXP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
10.45%
Positive growth while EXP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.41%
Margin expansion while EXP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.11%
G&A growth 50-75% of EXP's 16.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.75%
Other expenses change of 12.75% while EXP maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
13.49%
Similar operating expenses growth to EXP's 16.44%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
9.28%
Total costs growth while EXP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.81%
Interest expense growth while EXP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.79%
D&A growth above 1.5x EXP's 0.40%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
6.92%
EBITDA growth while EXP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.31%
EBITDA margin growth while EXP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.38%
Operating income growth while EXP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
28.13%
Other expenses growth while EXP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.35%
Pre-tax income growth while EXP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.39%
Pre-tax margin growth while EXP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.49%
Tax expense growth while EXP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.32%
Net income growth while EXP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.29%
EPS growth while EXP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.79%
Diluted EPS growth while EXP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.57%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.48%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.