111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
47.77%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x JHX's 4.66%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
26.51%
Cost growth above 1.5x JHX's 2.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
103.38%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x JHX's 8.09%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
37.63%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x JHX's 3.27%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.01%
G&A change of 9.01% while JHX maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-163.35%
Other expenses reduction while JHX shows 733.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.30%
Operating expenses growth less than half of JHX's 17.41%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
20.14%
Total costs growth above 1.5x JHX's 5.36%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
16.54%
Interest expense growth while JHX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.80%
D&A growth above 1.5x JHX's 1.46%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
272.30%
EBITDA growth while JHX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
151.94%
EBITDA margin growth while JHX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6432.14%
Operating income growth while JHX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4320.39%
Operating margin growth while JHX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-235.21%
Other expenses reduction while JHX shows 52.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1650.51%
Pre-tax income growth while JHX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1084.59%
Pre-tax margin growth while JHX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2363.16%
Tax expense growth while JHX reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
1018.10%
Net income growth while JHX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
656.64%
Net margin growth while JHX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1081.25%
EPS growth while JHX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1075.00%
Diluted EPS growth while JHX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.33%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.66%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
