111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
51.07%
Positive growth while JHX shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
25.64%
Cost increase while JHX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
119.16%
Positive growth while JHX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
45.08%
Margin expansion while JHX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while JHX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of JHX's 58000.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
16.55%
Operating expenses growth less than half of JHX's 36.59%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
23.18%
Total costs growth above 1.5x JHX's 6.87%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-210.50%
Interest expense reduction while JHX shows 11.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
D&A reduction while JHX shows 4.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
315.14%
EBITDA growth while JHX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
174.81%
EBITDA margin growth while JHX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10650.00%
Operating income growth while JHX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7016.11%
Operating margin growth while JHX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.15%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1302.74%
Pre-tax income growth while JHX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
896.17%
Pre-tax margin growth while JHX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-632.76%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
1503.19%
Net income growth while JHX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1028.86%
Net margin growth while JHX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1400.00%
EPS growth while JHX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1393.33%
Diluted EPS growth while JHX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.28%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.15%
Diluted share increase while JHX reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
