PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
32.26%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MLM's 2.63%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-100.00%
Cost reduction while MLM shows 4.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
339.49%
Positive growth while MLM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
232.29%
Margin expansion while MLM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while MLM shows 5.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses change of 100.00% while MLM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Total costs reduction while MLM shows 4.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while MLM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
100.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x MLM's 6.28%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
1683.04%
EBITDA growth while MLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1248.13%
EBITDA margin growth while MLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1632.99%
Operating income growth while MLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1210.28%
Operating margin growth while MLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while MLM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-755.66%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
103.24%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x MLM's 0.49%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
53.67%
Net margin growth while MLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
104.26%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x MLM's 1.20%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
104.26%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x MLM's 1.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.