PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
69.54%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SUM's 4.73%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-100.00%
Cost reduction while SUM shows 3.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
483.23%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x SUM's 7.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
244.01%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x SUM's 2.65%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while SUM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Total costs reduction while SUM shows 3.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
2507.18%
EBITDA growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1552.86%
EBITDA margin growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2778.72%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x SUM's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1597.96%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SUM's 3.27%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while SUM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Pre-tax income decline while SUM shows 5.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while SUM shows 0.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1148.94%
Tax expense reduction while SUM shows 29.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
307.97%
Net income growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
140.63%
Net margin growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
283.33%
EPS change of 283.33% while SUM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
275.00%
Diluted EPS change of 275.00% while SUM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
22.77%
Share count reduction below 50% of SUM's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
23.91%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SUM's 0.09%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.