PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
45.60%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SUM's 4.73%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-100.00%
Cost reduction while SUM shows 3.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
402.71%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x SUM's 7.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
245.27%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x SUM's 2.65%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Total costs reduction while SUM shows 3.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
D&A growth while SUM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
3547.44%
EBITDA growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2405.11%
EBITDA margin growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3233.53%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x SUM's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2189.52%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SUM's 3.27%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while SUM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Pre-tax income decline while SUM shows 5.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while SUM shows 0.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1008.28%
Tax expense reduction while SUM shows 29.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
228.01%
Net income growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
125.28%
Net margin growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
346.15%
EPS change of 346.15% while SUM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
338.46%
Diluted EPS change of 338.46% while SUM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-28.12%
Share count reduction while SUM shows 0.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-27.47%
Diluted share reduction while SUM shows 0.09% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.