PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
28.94%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SUM's 4.73%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-100.00%
Cost reduction while SUM shows 3.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
330.73%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x SUM's 7.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
234.05%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x SUM's 2.65%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while SUM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Total costs reduction while SUM shows 3.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1626.69%
EBITDA growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1349.03%
EBITDA margin growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1860.29%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x SUM's 8.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1420.28%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SUM's 3.27%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while SUM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Pre-tax income decline while SUM shows 5.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while SUM shows 0.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-935.22%
Tax expense reduction while SUM shows 29.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
186.44%
Net income growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
122.14%
Net margin growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
186.96%
EPS change of 186.96% while SUM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
186.96%
Diluted EPS change of 186.96% while SUM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.32%
Share count reduction below 50% of SUM's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.38%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SUM's 0.09%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.