111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.12%
Revenue decline while SUM shows 9.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.25%
Cost reduction while SUM shows 10.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.85%
Gross profit decline while SUM shows 6.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while SUM shows 23.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while SUM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while SUM shows 2759.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.62%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SUM's 14.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-0.03%
Total costs reduction while SUM shows 10.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.00%
Interest expense reduction while SUM shows 0.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-27.31%
D&A reduction while SUM shows 4.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.72%
EBITDA decline while SUM shows 80.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.24%
EBITDA margin decline while SUM shows 65.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.15%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.16%
Other expenses reduction while SUM shows 673.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.76%
Pre-tax income decline while SUM shows 139.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.52%
Pre-tax margin decline while SUM shows 119.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.99%
Tax expense reduction while SUM shows 6.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.18%
Net income decline while SUM shows 175.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.79%
Net margin decline while SUM shows 152.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.29%
EPS decline while SUM shows 175.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.46%
Diluted EPS decline while SUM shows 174.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.18%
Share count reduction while SUM shows 0.07% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-3.78%
Diluted share reduction while SUM shows 0.28% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.