PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.92%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SUM's 4.73%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
7.98%
Cost growth above 1.5x SUM's 3.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
10.45%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x SUM's 7.51%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
1.41%
Margin expansion 50-75% of SUM's 2.65%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.11%
G&A growth while SUM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.75%
Other expenses growth while SUM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.49%
Operating expenses growth while SUM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.28%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SUM's 3.00%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
5.81%
Interest expense growth while SUM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.79%
D&A growth while SUM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.92%
EBITDA growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.31%
EBITDA margin growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.38%
Similar operating income growth to SUM's 8.15%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-1.41%
Operating margin decline while SUM shows 3.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
28.13%
Other expenses growth while SUM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.35%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x SUM's 5.18%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.39%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to SUM's 0.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
23.49%
Similar tax expense growth to SUM's 29.92%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
4.32%
Net income growth while SUM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.29%
EPS change of 5.29% while SUM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
4.79%
Diluted EPS change of 4.79% while SUM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-0.57%
Share count reduction while SUM shows 0.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.48%
Diluted share reduction while SUM shows 0.09% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.