PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
51.07%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 0.29%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
25.64%
Cost growth above 1.5x USLM's 10.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
119.16%
Positive growth while USLM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
45.08%
Margin expansion while USLM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while USLM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses change of 100.00% while USLM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
16.55%
Operating expenses growth while USLM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.18%
Total costs growth above 1.5x USLM's 8.70%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-210.50%
Interest expense reduction while USLM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
D&A reduction while USLM shows 0.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
315.14%
EBITDA growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
174.81%
EBITDA margin growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10650.00%
Operating income growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7016.11%
Operating margin growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.15%
Other expenses reduction while USLM shows 0.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1302.74%
Pre-tax income growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
896.17%
Pre-tax margin growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-632.76%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
1503.19%
Net income growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1028.86%
Net margin growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1400.00%
EPS growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1393.33%
Diluted EPS growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.28%
Share count reduction while USLM shows 0.15% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.15%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of USLM's 0.03%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.