PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
45.60%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 11.45%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-100.00%
Cost reduction while USLM shows 6.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
402.71%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 18.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
245.27%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x USLM's 6.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while USLM shows 20.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Operating expenses reduction while USLM shows 20.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Total costs reduction while USLM shows 8.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x USLM's 2.23%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
3547.44%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 13.26%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2405.11%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 15.96%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3233.53%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 29.41%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2189.52%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 16.11%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while USLM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1008.28%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
228.01%
Net income growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
125.28%
Net margin growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
346.15%
EPS growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
338.46%
Diluted EPS growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-28.12%
Share count reduction while USLM shows 0.27% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-27.47%
Diluted share reduction while USLM shows 0.27% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.