PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
27.06%
Positive growth while USLM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
316.29%
Positive growth while USLM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
227.62%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x USLM's 0.98%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while USLM shows 2.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses change of 100.00% while USLM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-100.00%
Operating expenses reduction while USLM shows 2.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while USLM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
100.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x USLM's 11.73%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
1776.84%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 26.20%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1377.08%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x USLM's 4.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1708.06%
Operating income growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1322.95%
Operating margin growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while USLM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-956.59%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
132.28%
Net income growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
82.81%
Net margin growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.26%
EPS growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.26%
Diluted EPS growth while USLM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.99%
Share count increase while USLM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.42%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of USLM's 5.58%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.