111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-27.63%
Revenue decline while VMC shows 308.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-100.00%
Cost reduction while VMC shows 1325.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
23.14%
Positive growth while VMC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
70.16%
Margin expansion while VMC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while VMC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x VMC's 55.23%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-100.00%
Total costs reduction while VMC shows 647.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while VMC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
100.00%
D&A growth while VMC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
144.19%
EBITDA growth while VMC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
161.06%
EBITDA margin growth while VMC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
144.19%
Operating income growth while VMC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
161.06%
Operating margin growth while VMC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while VMC shows 97.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
55.08%
Tax expense growth while VMC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-55.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.94%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
131.86%
EPS growth while VMC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
132.14%
Diluted EPS growth while VMC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.