PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.12%
Revenue decline while VMC shows 3.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.25%
Cost reduction while VMC shows 4.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.85%
Gross profit decline while VMC shows 1.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while VMC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while VMC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.62%
Operating expenses growth while VMC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.03%
Total costs reduction while VMC shows 3.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-27.31%
D&A reduction while VMC shows 3.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.72%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.24%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.15%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.16%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-20.76%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.99%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-18.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.29%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.46%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.18%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-3.78%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.