PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-30.55%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-21.65%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-46.45%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.59%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-19.36%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.64%
Interest expense reduction while VMC shows 4.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-58.77%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-51.93%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-97.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-96.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
353.57%
Other expenses growth while VMC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-91.93%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-106.24%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-88.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-82.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.32%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.32%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.85%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-3.06%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.