111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-5.22%
Negative ROE while JHX stands at 380.30%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-2.60%
Negative ROA while JHX stands at 20.81%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-31.44%
Both companies show negative ROCE. Martin Whitman would investigate if external factors hamper profitability.
128.42%
Gross margin above 1.5x JHX's 30.91%. David Dodd would assess whether superior technology or brand is driving this.
47.16%
Positive operating margin while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a significant competitive edge in operations.
4.75%
Net margin below 50% of JHX's 155.42%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or structural weaknesses.