PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
1.89
1.5–2 – Reasonable coverage. Seth Klarman would verify if cyclical factors might push it below comfort levels.
1.08
1.0–1.2 – On the edge. Philip Fisher might worry about unexpected shortfalls or partial reliance on inventory liquidation.
0.03
Below 0.4 – Weak immediate liquidity. Howard Marks would worry about meeting obligations if markets tighten.
1.51
Below 2 – Weak. Howard Marks would fear that a downturn might jeopardize debt payments.
0.62
Below 1.0 – Risk of falling short. Howard Marks would suspect the firm might need external funding if OCF falters.